|
|
|
|
|
The auction
Author: Yankee01
|
| |
(Added on Feb 5, 2012)
(This month 52467 readers) (Total 63818 readers) |
| |
Based upon a fantasy of a friend, it is a fictional story of her being auctioned off. |
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 3 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
33% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
33% |
33% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (7/10) |
Average
Rating:  (7.5/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (3/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
kemosabe
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 17, 2012 |
| |
A short intro into what appears to be an interesting tale. I find no fault with the author's language either and look forward to Part II (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
JimmyJump
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 11, 2012 |
| |
Wonder what's gotten into _ID_ to grant only three points, because as far as my knowledge of Shakespeare's language goes, I couldn't find anything wrong with either spelling or grammar nor word choice.
On the contrary, I found "The Auction" to be almost without fault or error, with a good choice of words, unveiling a more than adequate vocabulary.
This results in a very well written first part; to the point I am as good as certain that Yankee01 isn't a novice at writing, whatever genre of story.
"The Auction" is yet again proof that it doesn't matter what subject you bring, but indeed how you bring it.
For that matter, Yankee01 is very good at bringing.
Was going to go for a fat niner, but adding a point to compensate for the silly behaviour of the erring reviewer before me...
JJ (10/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Yankee01
(Edit) (Feb 12, 2012)
- Thank you. I feel vindicated since I believe I have a good command of the English language.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
_ID_
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 11, 2012 |
| |
Spelling, grammar, and word choice all combined to be distracting errors. Combined with no character development make this a fairly low rating. Working a rewrite to fix those things would be a worthwhile effort on the part of the author. (3/10)
|
|
|
About 